Link back to the main website of Te Ohu

CEO's Introduction

He Kororia ki te Atua
He maungarongo ki runga i te whenua
He whakaaro pai ki nga tangata katoa

Nga whakaaro ki a ratou kua wheturangitia, me ou ratou whanau i noho ai i raro i te kapua pouri. Nga manaakitanga o te Atua ki runga i a tatou katoa.

 

Nga whakaaro ki a ratou kua wheturangitia, me ou ratou whanau i noho ai i raro i te kapua pouri. Nga manaakitanga o te Atua ki runga i a tatou katoa.

In the two years since the passing of the Maori Fisheries Act and Te Ohu Kaimoana taking over the role of the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission, it is perhaps timely to take stock of the events of the last two years and the progress made on allocation of the fisheries settlement.

The September mandating of eight iwi organisations and allocation of their share of assets was widely publicised throughout the country. Rather than making news in the country's major metropolitan newspapers, however, these recent allocations only caught the interest of journalists at provincial newspapers; their articles took a local flavour as they wrote about the opportunities for iwi in their areas.

The public interest in our organisation has reduced immensely since the debate over how to allocate the settlement came to its conclusion in 2003. The publication of He Kawai Amokura, the report that detailed the final agreement over each iwi's share and which was sent to the Minister of Fisheries, completed 12 years of passionate discussion over allocation. At the same time, journalists' interest in the workings of the Commission similarly dried up. The old adage that “good news is not news” appears true for our metropolitan daily newspapers.

Media that concentrate on issues pertaining solely to Maori, such as Radio Waatea, Maori Television, Mana News and a few others, continue to provide a good flow of information for iwi organisations over fisheries issues, reflecting the importance of kai moana and the marine environment to our people.

Allocation also is of interest in the provinces where the injection of millions of dollars is likely to have a noticeable and a possibly more immediate effect. However, once allocation is completed and the fisheries settlement assets are in their final resting places, the interests of Maori – and the New Zealand public alike – will likely fall on how those assets are used. While some iwi representatives might find such interest an intrusion into their rights to manage their fisheries settlement as they see fit, it must also be seen as further means of ensuring accountability outside of the standard financial reporting mechanisms.

The total value of the assets being distributed is not small. Taken collectively, fisheries assets worth more than $350 million have been allocated to the 35 iwi organisations that have been mandated in the last 12 months. And there are still a further 22 iwi organisations that will hopefully have completed the process in time for the April 2007 fishing year. The total amount allocated will have an enormous impact on the Maori economy and iwis' utilisation of the asset will likely generate interest.

A key component of allocation has been ensuring the right management and constitutional structures are in place. Accountability plays an important role in protecting the settlement for future generations. In the process of mandating iwi in the last 12 months, there has been some criticism of this, notably that some iwi are having to duplicate structures to satisfy Te Ohu Kaimoana for the fisheries settlement and also the Crown for other Treaty settlements. Te Ohu Kaimoana has some sympathy with this view, but believes that requirements can be met in such a way that satisfies all parties involved.

In any event, Te Ohu Kaimoana is confident that the template constitutions and management structures that are offered to iwi organisations in the fisheries settlement processes can meet the needs of iwi in discussions with the Crown.

Our role is to place these fisheries assets with MIOs as soon as is practicable. Te Ohu Kaimoana will have a reduced role to play in the future. That role is likely to involve protection of our asset value through involvement in fisheries management issues and limited staff where allocation will be a mechanical process of delivery to MIOs each year.

Te Ohu Kaimoana
Iwi approved as Mandated Iwi Organisations (MIO)
at 30 September 2006

IWI

MIO DATE

approx VAlue (NZ$)

Ngapuhi

Sept 05

60,550,000

Ngati Kahu ki Whaingaroa

Sept 05

1,150,000

Te Aitanga a Mahaki

Sept 05

2,541,000

Ngati Rarua

Sept 05

455,000

Ngati Mutunga (Chatham)

Sept 05

13,763,000

Moriori

Sept 05

13,462,000

Ngati Awa

Nov 05

7,481,000

Ngaitakoto

Nov 05

843,000

Te Atiawa ki Whakarongotai

Nov 05

677,000

Ngai Tamanuhiri

Feb 06

682,000

Ngati Kuia

Feb 06

713,000

Ngati Apa ki te Waipounamu

Feb 06

367,000

Ngati Apa (North Island)

Mar 06

1,388,000

Ngati Hauiti

Mar 06

971,000

Ngati Whatua

Mar 06

7,404,000

Ngati Ruanui

Mar 06

3,205,000

Ngati Porou

Mar 06

35,915,000

Te Atiawa (Wellington)

Mar 06

993,000

Ngati Koata

Mar 06

498,000

Ngai Tahu

May 06

59,074,000

Waikato

May 06

27,093,000

Rongowhakaata

May 06

2,171,000

Ngati Kahungunu

Aug 06

31,139,000

Hauraki (representing 12 iwi)

Aug 06

7,932,000

Te Atihaunui a Paparangi

Aug 06

5,694,000

Te Rarawa

Aug 06

6,987,000

Te Arawa (representing 11 iwi)

Sept 06

23,602,000

Taranaki

Sept 06

3,495,000

Ngati Tama ( South Island )

Sept 06

364,000

Ngati Pukenga

Sept 06

988,000

Ngaitai

Sept 06

1,320,000

Tuhoe

Sept 06

17,309,000

Te Atiawa (Taranaki)

Sept 06

8,237,000

Ngati Raukawa ki Waikato

Sept 06

5,271,000

Ngati Mutunga (Taranaki)

Sept 06

960,000

TOTAL

 

$354,693,000

 

Notes:

Naku noa, na
Peter Douglas
Chief Executive


If you have any news or events coming up that you'd like covered
in an issue of Te Tai Pari, drop us an email at

Link back to the main website of Te Ohu

Tiakina ngā rawa hi ika, a tātou kaimoana mo ngā uri whakaheke
Protecting Māori fisheries assets for future generations